Ethics Awareness Inventory Summary Tammy Corbitt PSYCH/545 May 30, 2011 Dr. Terry Portis Ethics Awareness Inventory Summary The Ethics Awareness Inventory is a guide to the personal awareness of my ethical perspective and style. This summary will show how others and I approach ethical decision making. I will explain the importance of understanding my own personal ethical perspective. I will analyze the relationship between personal and professional ethics in the field of psychology. EAI Scoring Summary
My ethical perspective after taking the Ethics Awareness Inventory questionnaire is most closely aligned with obligation. The ‘Obligation’ perspective in the EAI, represented by the letter O, is most closely aligned with a deontological theory in which the focus is on an individual’s duty or obligation to do what is morally right. This theory looks to what we intend by our actions, rather than the consequences of our actions. Immanuel Kant is the philosopher most frequently associated with this moral theory.
By appealing to ‘conscience’ and the notion that individuals are moved to action by moral reason, Kant seeks to justify that ordinary moral judgments, in the Judeo-Christian tradition, are legitimately true (Williams, 2008). I base my ethical perspective on one’s duty or obligation to do what is morally right. I believe we choose how we act and what rules we are willing to follow. The results show that from my perspective, ethical principles must be appropriate under any circumstances, be respectful of human dignity, and committed to promoting individual freedom and autonomy.
The ethical profile is least closely aligned with (E) equity. The ‘Equity’ perspective in the EAI, represented by the letter E, is most closely aligned with a postmodern theory that emerged in the early 1970s and developed as a critique of the traditional principles associated with philosophical thinking in ‘modern’ times (generally considered as a part of the Enlightenment project of the 18th century). This critique challenges five ajor characteristics of modern thought (including deontology and utilitarianism): 1) its commitment to individualism; 2) its commitment to equality; 3) the notion of social progress; 4) its commitment to universal principles shared by a common humanity and based on the concept of universal reason; and 5) its commitment to absolute truths, objective science, and the rational planning of ideal social orders (Williams, 2008). The category with which my ethical profile is most closely aligned will reflect my beliefs.
The category with which my ethical profile is least closely aligned reflects the values that do not resonate with my views on ethics. (EAI) Scoring Summary | |C |O |R |E | | |MOST |3 |11 |5 |5 | | |LEAST |5 |3 |6 |10 | | |COMBINED |-2 |8 |-1 |-5 | | Ethical Style My ethical style is the belief that human beings have intrinsic value-we have a right to individual respect.
I do not entirely support social traditions and policies that are aimed at the best interest of society as a whole; especially when an individual is denied the opportunities to which he or she is entitled as a human being. When it comes to ethical conduct on my part acting in response to impulse, instinct, or rules worked out by others to obey, I believe human beings should be allowed to make their own choices within legal and humane limits. The different approaches between these styles could translate to friction between people.
As an example, a person that does things based on obligation may think he/she is behaving ethically, while a person that bases his/hers decisions on character may not. Likewise, people who are results oriented tend to look at benefit vs. cost, and consequently, their decisions may be perceived as unethical (Collack, 2007). Articulation of Perspectives In the A3 process-Articulation-is how we communicate our perspectives to others. Communication is important to successful voice to my ethical perspective and opinions.
My ability to identify the perspectives of others through recognizing the language used will further assist me in understanding and speaking to the needs and values of others. Using the language of others perspectives to better communicate my own perspective will help others to understand my position more clearly, leading to greater success. Application-Ethical Decision Making In ethical decision making is developing and Awareness of ethical perspective and style (the principles and processes) I use most frequently in determining what I believe to be right or wrong. In some beliefs I can remain value neutral this is in the research studies.
When faced with ethical decisions, people believe that there are right and wrong answers. These beliefs do not mean that everyone will have the same results. I have the ability to use my understanding of the basis for making good choices (Awareness) and my ability to explain the principles behind my position (Articulation) to move toward the most critical step in the process- APPLICATION or ACTION-provides the key to sound ethical judgment. Conclusion In conclusion, the explanation of the importance of understanding my personal ethical perspectives are shown from the results on the Ethics Awareness Inventory.
The analyzed results of the relationship between personal and professional ethics in the field of psychology are shown in the Ethics Awareness Inventory Summary. References Collack, V. , (2007). Ethics Awareness Inventory: Interpretation. Williams, L. (2002). Ethics Awareness Inventory. The Williams Institute. Ethics Awareness Inventory. The Williams Institute for Ethics and Management. A Guide To Personal Awareness Of Your Ethical Perspective and Style (2011) (6th Ed. ). Williams, Ph. D. , L. M. , (2008). The Williams institute for ethics and management. Scottsdale, AZ.